Ballot Amendments
Explore the key constitutional amendments on the upcoming ballot and learn about their potential impact on our state. Use this guide to make an informed decision on Election Day!
Visit our Voter Resources.
Learn more about judges here.
Amendment 1
Proposes that elections for district school board members be partisan, allowing for political party affiliation to be indicated on the ballot.
Ballot Language: “Proposing amendments to the State Constitution to require members of a district school board to be elected in a partisan election rather than a nonpartisan election and to specify that the amendment only applies to elections held on or after the November 2026 general election. However, partisan primary elections may occur before the 2026 general election for purposes of nominating political party candidates to that office for placement on the 2026 general election ballot.”
Opponents argue that school boards—local bodies responsible for overseeing public education—should remain as apolitical as possible. Introducing partisan politics into school board elections risks deepening political divisions in our schools, where decisions should be focused on what's best for students, not political agendas. Allowing politics to shape school boards could lead to biased decisions on curriculum, school policies, and funding, amplifying the dangers of political polarization in education. Our schools should be safe spaces for learning and growth, not battlegrounds for political ideologies.
Amendment 2
Establishes a constitutional right to hunt and fish, recognizing these activities as the preferred method for managing and controlling fish and wildlife populations.
Ballot Language: “Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to preserve forever fishing and hunting, including by the use of traditional methods, as a public right and preferred means of responsibly managing and controlling fish and wildlife. Specifies that the amendment does not limit the authority granted to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission under Section 9 of Article IV of the State Constitution.”
We strongly encourage a NO vote on Amendment 2 to protect Florida’s wildlife, conservation practices, and private property rights. Here’s why:
Traditional methods = cruelty to animals: The term “traditional methods” in the amendment is vague and could allow for cruel practices like steel-jaw traps, snares, clubbing, and bear hunting with hounds—methods that are widely banned for their inhumane treatment of animals.
Undermines humane wildlife management: Amendment 2 shifts the focus from science-based, non-lethal methods of wildlife management to lethal ones. This could result in unnecessary harm to Florida’s diverse wildlife populations.
There is no threat to hunting and fishing rights: Despite claims from proponents, Florida law already guarantees the right to hunt and fish. This amendment is unnecessary and misleading.
Risks private property rights: Amendment 2 could allow hunters and their dogs to trespass on private property, overriding important property rights and enabling the use of firearms in pursuit of wildlife on private lands.
A special interest power grab: This amendment could be used to reverse Florida’s long-standing ban on gill nets, which decimate fish populations and harm sea life such as whales, dolphins, and sea turtles. It also opens the door to expanding hunting into state parks and wildlife preserves, as well as trophy hunting of Florida’s black bears.
A NO vote on Amendment 2 is crucial to protecting Florida’s natural habitats, promoting humane wildlife management, and preserving property rights. Let’s keep Florida a safe place for both people and wildlife.
Amendment 3
Allows adults 21 years and older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana for personal recreational use under Florida law.
Ballot Language: “Allows adults 21 years or older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana products and marijuana accessories for non-medical personal consumption by smoking, ingestion, or otherwise; allows Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers, and other state-licensed entities, to acquire, cultivate, process, manufacture, sell, and distribute such products and accessories.”
We support Amendment 3 because it represents a major opportunity for Florida's economy. A 'Yes' vote would legalize recreational marijuana for adults 21 and older, allowing them to purchase, possess, and consume cannabis without a doctor's recommendation. This measure has already proven successful in other states, generating billions in tax revenue that fund public services, education, and infrastructure.
By legalizing marijuana, Florida could see similar economic growth—creating thousands of new jobs in agriculture, retail, and tourism, while also establishing a new and significant revenue stream for the state. In addition, this would reduce the costs and burden of criminalizing personal cannabis use, allowing law enforcement to focus on more serious crimes. Amendment 3 is a smart step toward a more prosperous and fair Florida.
These funds will strengthen our schools, infrastructure, and build safer communities across Florida!
Amendment 4
Protects a woman’s right to choose by ensuring abortion access remains constitutionally protected.
Ballot Language: “No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion.”
We strongly support Amendment 4 as it is essential to protecting the freedom and equality of women in Florida. Every woman should have the right to make decisions about her own body, and access to abortion is a critical aspect of healthcare that can save lives.
This amendment ensures that women have the ability to access safe, legal abortions without government interference, particularly in situations where early restrictions can be harmful. Importantly, this amendment supports access to abortion up until viability, meaning the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb, not in the late stages of pregnancy. Contrary to misleading claims, this is about ensuring access to necessary care—not about performing abortions in the final months of pregnancy.
By supporting Amendment 4, we stand up for a woman’s right to control her own healthcare decisions and ensure equal access to life-saving medical care.
Vote Yes on Amendment 4 to protect a woman's right to choose and ensure that reproductive healthcare decisions remain personal and free from government interference.
Amendment 5
Proposes to extend the current two-year timeline for people to transfer their "Save Our Homes" property tax savings when moving to a new home.
Ballot Language: “Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to require an annual adjustment for inflation to the value of current or future homestead exemptions that apply solely to levies other than school district levies and for which every person who has legal or equitable title to real estate and maintains thereon the permanent residence of the owner, or another person legally or naturally dependent upon the owner is eligible. This amendment takes effect January 1, 2025.”
We are encouraging a NO vote on Amendment 5 to protect our local community and government. The language of this amendment is tricky, but it's important to understand the impact it will have:
A Yes vote would significantly harm local government revenues, cutting nearly $23 million in non-school government property taxes in the 2025-26 fiscal year, and up to $112 million in the years following. This reduction in funding would limit critical services we all rely on.
A Yes vote would weaken our ability to recover from emergencies, such as hurricanes or other natural disasters, by restricting the funds available to our county or city. This is especially dangerous for a hurricane-prone, tourist-dependent economy like ours.
A NO vote protects our home rule—keeping the power in local hands, so our county or city can make quick decisions, manage recovery efforts, and govern ourselves without interference from Tallahassee. This is crucial for our community's ability to respond to disasters and ensure a strong, self-sufficient local government.
Amendment 6
Proposes to repeal public financing for statewide campaigns. Currently, candidates for offices like Governor, Attorney General, and Chief Financial Officer can receive public funding if they agree to campaign spending limits.
Ballot Language: “Proposing the repeal of the provision in the State Constitution which requires public financing for campaigns of candidates for elective statewide office who agree to campaign spending limits.”
We are urging a NO vote on Amendment 6 to keep elections fair and accessible to everyone, not just the wealthy elite. Here’s why:
A NO vote ensures a level playing field, so everyday people like teachers, nurses, and other concerned citizens can run for statewide office. Public funding allows a wider range of candidates to participate.
A Yes vote would eliminate public funding for statewide campaigns, making it much harder for everyday people to run for office and leaving the door open only to wealthy candidates.
A NO vote protects democracy by allowing more diverse voices and candidates to compete, ensuring that our representatives reflect the people, not just the rich and powerful.
A Yes vote only benefits wealthy incumbents and politicians in Tallahassee, making it even more difficult to bring about meaningful change in our state government.